Transport Focus: Difference between revisions
There might be a few operator or link errors, but we've now got 2018's results! Now to update the surveys, add the interesting ones to the MSA pages and blog about it... |
m typo |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Transport Focus''' is a watchdog for transport users in the UK, sponsored by the Department for Transport. In | '''Transport Focus''' ([https://www.transportfocus.org.uk/ official website]) is a 'watchdog' for transport users in the UK, sponsored by the Department for Transport. After England's major road network was taken out of direct government control, Transport Focus had their remit expanded in 2015 to represent the needs of users of those roads. In practice, their work involves conducting satisfaction surveys for the benefit of the industry and the media, which since 2017 has included a regular investigation into motorway service areas. | ||
While their full study gives an interesting account of what customers look for in a service station, it is the so-called 'league table' that attracts press attention. The league table normally shows that the vast majority of service areas achieve virtually the same score, but by organising them into a scoreboard and ignoring the margin of error, it adds potential for some dramatic headlines that in turn generate publicity that is then used to justify the watchdog's expenditure. | |||
Transport Focus's work remains much more thorough than many of the other 'surveys' that are published about service stations. However, while they sell their report as being for the benefit of consumers, their work is only really of immediate benefit of service station operators. For example, recent surveys have studied the use and satisfaction of different ordering systems, which no road user is going to factor into their journey, but the surveys have never studied the impact of service station location - which is extremely important to road users. | |||
Their relentless positivity can be seen when comparing their satisfaction scores with those of consumer group [[Which Magazine|Which? Magazine]], which in a similar period produced much, much lower results. There is nothing inherently wrong with either study: they are both useful tools with a lot of data that has been packaged it up for very different audiences. In 2024, even Transport Focus felt fit to ask themselves why their results were seemingly out of step with public opinion, with their own foreword including the statement: "it is not clear exactly why there is such a large disparity between satisfaction at a particular site and provision as a whole". | |||
As the UK's road authorities and the road network's facilities now have virtually no supervision, many people imagine Transport Focus will be that regulator, but their remit is merely to represent road users and their work on roads is more like a consultancy, where they provide helpful advice to the industry but never say anything that will cause any upset. | |||
==2023/2024 HGV Survey== | |||
Between September 2023 and February 2024, a new form of survey was conducted for the benefit of HGV drivers. This follows several years of criticism from HGV facilities that forced the Department for Transport to promise improvements. The results were published in November 2024, with follow-ups expected over the following years. | |||
Surveys were conducted at roughly of a third of English HGV facilities, which included motorway service areas, some A-road service areas, signposted truckstops and most commercial truckstops that are positioned with 5km of an English trunk road; they reckon there are around 225 of these in total. Despite all the issues HGV drivers had reported, Transport Focus's work concluded that drivers were "highly satisfied" with the facilities they were using, despite the full report highlighting "significant" issues with a shortage of facilities, "major" complaints about there not being enough places to park, "increasing" concern that overnight parking is unsafe, "many" complaints about overnight parking being too noisy to sleep and "comparatively low" satisfaction with the food available. This discrepancy was highlighted by the report itself, but could not be explained. | |||
The first two of those criticisms are largely out of the control of the facilities surveyed, so this survey ought to be treated more as an assessment of the scale of the problem, rather than a comparison of who's doing a good or a bad job, not that the media will view it that way. This is especially true seeing as only a representative sample have been studied, so the worst performers may not be the worst in the country. | |||
The results shown below highlight the service areas and truckstops which are officially signed from the major road network only. In line with other pages on this website, facilities that aren't signposted are not included. The highest satisfaction score of 99% went to Formula Premier Truckstop in Ellesmere Port. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
! Ranking !! Name !! Operator !! Score | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || [[Sutterton|Sutterton Truck Port]] || Sutterton Truck Port || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || [[Ingleby Arncliffe|Ingleby Arncliffe services northbound]] || Exelby Services || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || [[Strensham|Strensham services southbound]] || Roadchef || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 9 || [[Ashford|Ashford International Truckstop]] || Ashford International Truckstop || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 13 || [[Red Lion|Red Lion Truckstop]] || Red Lion Truckstop || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 14 || [[Folkestone|Folkestone services]] || Stop 24 || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 18 || [[Stibbington|Stibbington Diner]] || Stibbington Diner || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 21 || [[Stafford (South)|Stafford services southbound]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 23 || [[Reading|Reading services westbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 24 || [[Warwick|Warwick services southbound]] || Welcome Break || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 25 || [[South Mimms|South Mimms services]] || Welcome Break || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 27 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf services southbound]] || Roadchef || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 28 || [[Leicester North|Leicester North services]] || Shell || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 29 || [[Corley|Corley services north-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 30 || [[Wetherby|Wetherby services]] || Moto || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 31 || [[Adderstone|Adderstone services]] || Purdy Lodge || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 33 || [[Chester|Chester services]] || Roadchef || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 34 || [[Winchester|Winchester services southbound]] || Moto || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 35 || [[Lymm|Lymm truckstop]] || Moto || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 36 || [[Fourwentways|Fourwentways services]] || Shell || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 38 || [[Hopwood Park|Hopwood Park services]] || Welcome Break || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 39 || [[Maidstone|Maidstone services]] || Roadchef || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 40 || [[Rivington|Rivington services southbound]] || EG On The Move || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 41 || [[Cartgate picnic area]] || National Highways || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 43 || [[Durham|Durham services]] || Roadchef || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 44 || [[Gordano|Gordano services]] || Welcome Break || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 45 || [[Birchanger Green|Birchanger Green services]] || Welcome Break || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 46 || [[Michaelwood|Michaelwood services]] || Welcome Break || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 || [[London Gateway|London Gateway services]] || Welcome Break || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 49 || [[Cherwell Valley|Cherwell Valley services]] || Moto || 83 | |||
|- | |||
| 50 || [[Grantham North|Grantham North services]] || Moto || 83 | |||
|- | |||
| 51 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park services southbound]] || Moto || 82 | |||
|- | |||
| 52 || [[Cambridge|Cambridge services]] || Extra || 82 | |||
|- | |||
| 53 || [[Leigh Delamere|Leigh Delamere services eastbound]] || Moto || 82 | |||
|- | |||
| 54 || [[Sandbach|Sandbach services southbound]] || Roadchef || 82 | |||
|- | |||
| 55 || [[Northampton|Northampton services southbound]] || Roadchef || 81 | |||
|- | |||
| 56 || [[Leeming Bar|Leeming Bar rest area]] || Moto || 80 | |||
|- | |||
| 57 || [[Beaconsfield|Beaconsfield services]] || Extra || 80 | |||
|- | |||
| 58 || [[Sutton Scotney|Sutton Scotney services northbound]] || Roadchef || 79 | |||
|- | |||
| 59 || [[Bridgwater|Bridgwater services]] || Moto || 78 | |||
|- | |||
| 60 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor services eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 76 | |||
|- | |||
| 61 || [[Cobham|Cobham services]] || Extra || 76 | |||
|- | |||
| 63 || [[Trowell|Trowell services northbound]] || Moto || 76 | |||
|- | |||
| 64 || [[Brampton Hut|Brampton Hut services]] || BP Express || 74 | |||
|- | |||
| 65 || [[Frankley|Frankley services southbound]] || Moto || 74 | |||
|- | |||
| 66 || [[Sedgemoor (North)|Sedgemoor services northbound]] || Welcome Break || 72 | |||
|- | |||
| 67 || [[Burtonwood|Burtonwood services]] || Welcome Break || 72 | |||
|- | |||
| 68 || [[Chieveley|Chieveley services]] || Moto || 71 | |||
|- | |||
| 69 || [[Birch|Birch services eastbound]] || Moto || 66 | |||
|- | |||
| 70 || [[Lancaster|Lancaster services southbound]] || Moto || 62 | |||
|- | |||
| 71 || [[Severn View|Severn View services]] || Moto || 62 | |||
|- | |||
| 72 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge services northbound]] || Moto || 60 | |||
|} | |||
It is worth noting that the nearly-derelict [[Leeming Bar]] and the absolutely huge [[Beaconsfield]] both received the exact same score, suggesting that there is no link at all between size or scale and the result received. | |||
==2023 Survey== | |||
The 2023 survey took place during the spring and was published in October 2023, which began with a media event was held at [[Leeds Skelton Lake|Leeds Skelton Lake services]] and every participating operator sending a simultaneous tweet praising Transport Focus. This follows a summer where a large number of surveys from car hire companies have already been published and received a lot of media attention, despite those ones involving very little research. | |||
Transport Focus's results are a little bit more considered, and were as follows: | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
! Ranking !! Name !! Operator !! Score | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || [[Rugby]] || Moto || 100 | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || [[Killington Lake]] || Roadchef || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || [[Annandale Water]] || Roadchef || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || [[Wetherby]] || Moto || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || [[Stafford (South)|Stafford southbound]] || Roadchef || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || [[Corley|Corley south-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || [[Chester]] || Roadchef || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || [[Reading|Reading eastbound]] || Moto || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 9 || [[Leeds Skelton Lake]] || Extra || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 10 || [[Ferrybridge]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 11 || [[Donington]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 12 || [[Northampton|Northampton northbound]] || Roadchef || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 13 || [[Burton-in-Kendal]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 14 || [[Maidstone]] || Roadchef || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 15 || [[Reading|Reading westbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 16 || [[Birch|Birch westbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 17 || [[Frankley|Frankley northbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 18 || [[Trowell|Trowell northbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 19 || [[Medway|Medway westbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 20 || [[Woodall|Woodall southbound]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 21 || [[Abington]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 22 || [[Hopwood Park]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 23 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge southbound]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 24 || [[Corley|Corley north-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 25 || [[Heston|Heston westbound]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 26 || [[Birchanger Green]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 27 || [[Doncaster (North)]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 28 || [[Heston|Heston eastbound]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 29 || [[Southwaite|Southwaite southbound]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 30 || [[Stirling]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 31 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf southbound]] || Roadchef || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 32 || [[South Mimms]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 33 || [[Washington|Washington northbound]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 34 || [[Peterborough]] || Extra || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 35 || [[Beaconsfield]] || Extra || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 36 || [[Tamworth]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 37 || [[Fleet|Fleet north-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 38 || [[Hamilton]] || Roadchef || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 39 || [[Sarn Park]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 40 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park northbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 41 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge northbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 42 || [[Washington|Washington southbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 43 || [[Rownhams|Rownhams south-westbound]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 44 || [[Warwick|Warwick southbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 45 || [[Birch|Birch eastbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 46 || [[Telford]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 || [[Durham]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 48 || [[Blackburn with Darwen]] || Extra || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 49 || [[Oxford]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 50 || [[Baldock]] || Extra || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 51 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard southbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 52 || [[Strensham|Strensham northbound]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 53 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East southbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 54 || [[Michaelwood|Michaelwood northbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 55 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East northbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 56 || [[Watford Gap|Watford Gap northbound]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 57 || [[Burtonwood]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 58 || [[Newport Pagnell|Newport Pagnell northbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 59 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard northbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 60 || [[Gretna]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 61 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park southbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 62 || [[Warwick|Warwick northbound]] || Welcome Break || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 63 || [[Watford Gap|Watford Gap southbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 64 || [[Chieveley]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 65 || [[Cullompton]] || Extra || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 66 || [[Pease Pottage]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 67 || [[Cobham]] || Extra || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 68 || [[Winchester|Winchester northbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 69 || [[Strensham|Strensham southbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 70 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf northbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 71 || [[Pont Abraham]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 72 || [[Stafford (North)|Stafford northbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 73 || [[Trowell|Trowell southbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 74 || [[Medway|Medway eastbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 75 || [[Severn View]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 76 || [[Bothwell]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 77 || [[Kinross]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 78 || [[Frankley|Frankley southbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 79 || [[Exeter]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 80 || [[Michaelwood|Michaelwood southbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 81 || [[Southwaite|Southwaite northbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 82 || [[Leigh Delamere|Leigh Delamere eastbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 83 || [[Magor]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 84 || [[Sandbach|Sandbach northbound]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 85 || [[Thurrock]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 86 || [[Norton Canes]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 87 || [[Northampton|Northampton southbound]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 88 || [[Fleet|Fleet south-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 89 || [[Cherwell Valley]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 90 || [[Keele|Keele northbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 91 || [[Gordano]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 92 || [[Leigh Delamere|Leigh Delamere westbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 93 || [[Winchester|Winchester southbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 94 || [[Membury|Membury westbound]] || Welcome Break || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 95 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford southbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 96 || [[Keele|Keele southbound]] || Welcome Break || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 97 || [[Lancaster|Lancaster northbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 98 || [[Blyth]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 99 || [[Swansea West]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 100 || [[Clacket Lane|Clacket Lane westbound]] || Roadchef || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 101 || [[Clacket Lane|Clacket Lane eastbound]] || Roadchef || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 102 || [[Sedgemoor (South)|Sedgemoor southbound]] || Roadchef || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 103 || [[Taunton Deane|Taunton Deane southbound]] || Roadchef || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 104 || [[Cardiff West]] || Moto || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 105 || [[London Gateway]] || Welcome Break || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 106 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford northbound]] || Moto || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 107 || [[Taunton Deane|Taunton Deane northbound]] || Roadchef || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 108 || [[Woodall|Woodall northbound]] || Welcome Break || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 109 || [[Newport Pagnell|Newport Pagnell southbound]] || Welcome Break || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 110 || [[Rownhams|Rownhams north-eastbound]] || Roadchef || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 111 || [[Membury|Membury eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 112 || [[Sandbach|Sandbach southbound]] || Roadchef || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 113 || [[Cardiff Gate]] || Welcome Break || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 114 || [[Sedgemoor (North)|Sedgemoor northbound]] || Welcome Break || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 115 || [[Lancaster|Lancaster southbound]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 116 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor westbound]] || Welcome Break || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 117 || [[Bridgwater]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 118 || [[Toddington|Toddington southbound]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 119 || [[Toddington|Toddington northbound]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 120 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 84 | |||
|} | |||
[[EG Group]], [[Westmorland]] and [[Folkestone|Stop 24]] declined to be part of the survey, leaving just the major operators interested in the display. | |||
The media were interested in Hartshead Moor coming last again, but Transport Focus were keen to point out that this may have been as refurbishment works were ongoing, following the previous year's results being published. The Transport Focus summary also pointed out that the Transport Focus survey results have improved since Transport Focus started doing surveys. | |||
The results were published with the headline "satisfaction is high", despite starting from last year's high base. All four operators were praised, and while an example of a negative experience was given as staff being rude, it was immediately noted that this was rare and could have been because they were busy. | |||
Roadchef and Moto did well in the top 10s, with Extra surprisingly lacking, and Moto and Welcome Break at the lower ends. What's more interesting is that newer buildings didn't seem to yield any better results. Another interesting detail is that Extra and Roadchef performed well for perceived value for money, whereas Moto and Welcome Break performed poorly on this metric. [[Killington Lake]]'s toilets were fully recommended and [[Annandale Water]] was the most-recommended site. | |||
HGV drivers remained the least satisfied road users, and prices remained the biggest complaint, although one interesting chart did suggest that this was only true for [[Welcome Break]] and [[Moto]] - the two operators we already knew were inflating prices - suggesting their policy was not unnoticed by the public. | |||
==2022 Survey== | |||
The delayed 2022 survey was published in October, where a media event was held at the winning [[Rugby|Rugby services]], which is also the UK's newest entry. The report announced that "{{abbr|MSAs|motorway service areas}} are doing a great job" and that the results show that "service areas have once again performed well". Some issues were raised, like the high prices (as ever) and the poor HGV parking provision, but these were quickly glossed over and the government were thanked for improving HGV facilities. | |||
This time the scope of the survey was expanded to include Wales and Scotland, but Moto did not enter sites outside England, and [[Westmorland]] opted not to enter any of their sites, which caused a lot of confusion in the media. [[Folkestone|Stop 24]] did enter for the first time in a while. | |||
Another change for 2022 was that customers surveyed would now be offered the opportunity to provide detailed feedback at a later date. This allowed people to respond in their own time, though it assumes their experience was in any way memorable. | |||
What is interesting about the 2022 results is that the grade inflation is much more severe than it has been in previous years. The report itself asks that the figures do not be compared with previous years, because of the changed methodology and different time of year. | |||
The 2022 survey received even more media coverage than usual, including a feature on ''Have I Got News For You'', where one of the panellists called the league table "a waste of time". | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
! Ranking !! Name !! Operator !! Score | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || [[Rugby]] || Moto || 100 | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || [[Donington]] || Moto || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || [[Blackburn with Darwen]] || Extra || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || [[Strensham|Strensham northbound]] || Roadchef || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || [[Medway|Medway eastbound]] || Moto || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || [[Stafford (South)|Stafford southbound]] || Roadchef || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || [[Wetherby]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || [[Peterborough]] || Extra || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 9 || [[Washington|Washington southbound]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 10 || [[Rivington|Rivington northbound]] || EG Group || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 11 || [[Burton-in-Kendal]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 12 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford northbound]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 13 || [[Stafford (North)|Stafford northbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 14 || [[Northampton|Northampton southbound]] || Roadchef || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 15 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf southbound]] || Roadchef || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 16 || [[Birch|Birch westbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 17 || [[Corley|Corley north-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 18 || [[Keele|Keele northbound]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 19 || [[Sarn Park]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 20 || [[Killington Lake]] || Roadchef || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 21 || [[Northampton|Northampton northbound]] || Roadchef || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 22 || [[Corley|Corley south-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 23 || [[Oxford]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 24 || [[Fleet|Fleet north-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 25 || [[Medway|Medway westbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 26 || [[Chieveley]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 27 || [[Reading|Reading westbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 28 || [[Maidstone]] || Roadchef || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 29 || [[Leeds Skelton Lake]] || Extra || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 30 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf northbound]] || Roadchef || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 31 || [[Exeter]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 32 || [[Baldock]] || Extra || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 33 || [[Chester]] || Roadchef || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 34 || [[Rivington|Rivington southbound]] || Euro Garages || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 35 || [[Cherwell Valley]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 36 || [[Winchester|Winchester southbound]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 37 || [[Heston|Heston eastbound]] || Moto || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 38 || [[Keele|Keele southbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 39 || [[Cullompton]] || Extra || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 40 || [[Strensham|Strensham southbound]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 41 || [[Doncaster (North)]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 42 || [[Watford Gap|Watford Gap southbound]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 43 || [[Trowell|Trowell southbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 44 || [[Durham]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 45 || [[Trowell|Trowell northbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 46 || [[South Mimms]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 || [[Clacket Lane|Clacket Lane eastbound]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 48 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge southbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 49 || [[Clacket Lane|Clacket Lane westbound]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 50 || [[Fleet|Fleet south-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 51 || [[Hopwood Park]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 52 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East northbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 53 || [[Michaelwood|Michaelwood southbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 54 || [[Hamilton]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 55 || [[Burtonwood]] || Welcome Break || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 56 || [[Taunton Deane|Taunton Deane northbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 57 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East southbound]] || Welcome Break || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 58 || [[Beaconsfield]] || Extra || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 59 || [[Pease Pottage]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 60 || [[Birch|Birch eastbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 61 || [[Sandbach|Sandbach northbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 62 || [[Heston|Heston westbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 63 || [[Magor]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 64 || [[Rownhams|Rownhams westbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 65 || [[Leigh Delamere|Leigh Delamere eastbound]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 66 || [[Annandale Water]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 67 || [[Norton Canes]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 68 || [[Cobham]] || Extra || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 69 || [[Blyth]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 70 || [[Leigh Delamere|Leigh Delamere westbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 71 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard northbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 72 || [[Thurrock]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 73 || [[London Gateway]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 74 || [[Pont Abraham]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 75 || [[Reading|Reading eastbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 76 || [[Taunton Deane|Taunton Deane southbound]] || Roadchef || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 77 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park southbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 78 || [[Washington|Washington northbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 79 || [[Rownhams|Rownhams eastbound]] || Roadchef || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 80 || [[Lancaster|Lancaster northbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 81 || [[Watford Gap|Watford Gap northbound]] || Roadchef || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 82 || [[Frankley|Frankley northbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 83 || [[Cardiff Gate]] || Welcome Break || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 84 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park northbound]] || Moto || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 85 || [[Michaelwood|Michaelwood northbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 86 || [[Sedgemoor (South)|Sedgemoor southbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 87 || [[Southwaite|Southwaite southbound]] || Moto || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 88 || [[Abington]] || Welcome Break || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 89 || [[Telford]] || Welcome Break || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 90 || [[Newport Pagnell|Newport Pagnell northbound]] || Welcome Break || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 91 || [[Sedgemoor (North)|Sedgemoor northbound]] || Welcome Break || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 92 || [[Winchester|Winchester northbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 93 || [[Southwaite|Southwaite northbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 94 || [[Sandbach|Sandbach southbound]] || Roadchef || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 95 || [[Severn View]] || Moto || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 96 || [[Membury|Membury eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 97 || [[Newport Pagnell|Newport Pagnell southbound]] || Welcome Break || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 98 || [[Toddington|Toddington northbound]] || Moto || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 99 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford southbound]] || Moto || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 100 || [[Gretna]] || Welcome Break || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 101 || [[Ferrybridge]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 102 || [[Tamworth]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 103 || [[Membury|Membury westbound]] || Welcome Break || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 104 || [[Toddington|Toddington southbound]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 105 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor westbound]] || Welcome Break || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 106 || [[Bothwell]] || Roadchef || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 107 || [[Woodall|Woodall northbound]] || Welcome Break || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 108 || [[Warwick|Warwick northbound]] || Welcome Break || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 109 || [[Gordano]] || Welcome Break || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 110 || [[Bridgwater]] || Moto || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 111 || [[Woodall|Woodall southbound]] || Welcome Break || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 112 || [[Frankley|Frankley southbound]] || Moto || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 113 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge northbound]] || Moto || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 114 || [[Folkestone]] || Stop 24 || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 115 || [[Warwick|Warwick southbound]] || Welcome Break || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 116 || [[Birchanger Green]] || Welcome Break || 83 | |||
|- | |||
| 117 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard southbound]] || Welcome Break || 83 | |||
|- | |||
| 118 || [[Lancaster|Lancaster southbound]] || Moto || 83 | |||
|- | |||
| 119 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 80 | |||
|} | |||
Usual small print aside, the survey did show a large quantity of [[Moto]] service areas in the top 10, and of [[Welcome Break]]s in the bottom 10. [[Euro Garages]] were technically the best operator, and [[Folkestone|Stop 24]] technically the worst, but [[Extra]] were the best of the main operators and Welcome Break the worst of the main ones, where they scored particularly badly on toilets. | |||
Extra service areas were said to be especially popular, with people seeking them out and an "exceptionally high" number of people recommending them. [[McDonald's]] and [[Costa]] were said to be the most popular brands. | |||
==2020 Survey== | |||
The 2020 survey methodology was cut short due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, Transport Focus wisely did not publish a complete list of all scores. Instead they published the average score for each operator, and allowed the media to heap praise on every service area run by that operator, including ones which aren't on motorways. | |||
As always, the results for each operator were broadly proportionate to the number of sites they owned, with [[Moto]] getting 93% satisfaction and much-smaller [[Westmorland]] getting 97% satisfaction. Much was made of [[Euro Garages]] increasing their score from 86% to 96%, but as they only run one whole site, that figure is based on a much smaller sample and is prone to changing a lot. | |||
==2019 Survey== | |||
The 2019 survey was conducted in Spring 2019. In general most scores had fallen slightly, while the bottom few had all improved their act. The end result was that the rankings were shaken up a bit while remaining broadly the same. | |||
In particular, [[Euro Garages]] had fallen from the best operator to the worst, leaving [[Westmorland]] back in front. It was another good year for [[Roadchef]], and a disappointing one for [[Moto]]. It also found that professional drivers were the least satisfied, leisure the most, and prices remained the main bone of contention. | |||
For the first time, the highly-publicised league table produced a ranking for every single entrant, breaking apart the sites which had the same score. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
! Ranking !! Name !! Operator !! Score | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || [[Norton Canes]] || Roadchef || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || [[Heston|Heston westbound]] || Moto || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || [[Gloucester|Gloucester southbound]] || Westmorland || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || [[Stafford (North)|Stafford northbound]] || Moto || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || [[South Mimms]] || Welcome Break || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || [[Winchester|Winchester northbound]] || Moto || 99 | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || [[Gloucester|Gloucester northbound]] || Westmorland || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || [[Stafford (South)|Stafford southbound]] || Roadchef || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 9 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf northbound]] || Roadchef || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 10 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park southbound]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 11 || [[Exeter]] || Moto || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 12 || [[Michaelwood|Michaelwood northbound]] || Welcome Break || 98 | |||
|- | |||
| 13 || [[Oxford]] || Welcome Break || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 14 || [[Tebay|Tebay southbound]] || Westmorland || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 15 || [[Tebay|Tebay northbound]] || Westmorland || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 16 || [[Heston|Heston eastbound]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 17 || [[Chieveley]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 18 || [[Wetherby]] || Moto || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 19 || [[Killington Lake]] || Roadchef || 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 20 || [[London Gateway]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 21 || [[Clacket Lane|Clacket Lane westbound]] || Roadchef || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 22 || [[Michaelwood|Michaelwood southbound]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 23 || [[Warwick|Warwick southbound]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 24 || [[Rownhams|Rownhams westbound]] || Roadchef || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 25 || [[Hopwood Park]] || Welcome Break || 96 | |||
|- | |||
| 26 || [[Cherwell Valley]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 27 || [[Pease Pottage]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 28 || [[Warwick|Warwick northbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 29 || [[Maidstone]] || Roadchef || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 30 || [[Birchanger Green]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 31 || [[Peterborough]] || Extra || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 32 || [[Trowell|Trowell southbound]] || Moto || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 33 || [[Corley|Corley south-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 95 | |||
|- | |||
| 34 || [[Doncaster (North)]] || Moto || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 35 || [[Northampton|Northampton northbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 36 || [[Corley|Corley north-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 37 || [[Sandbach|Sandbach southbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | |||
|- | |||
| 38 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge southbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 39 || [[Taunton Deane|Taunton Deane northbound]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 40 || [[Keele|Keele northbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 41 || [[Fleet|Fleet south-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 42 || [[Taunton Deane|Taunton Deane southbound]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 43 || [[Thurrock]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 44 || [[Baldock]] || Extra || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 45 || [[Durham]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 46 || [[Rownhams|Rownhams northbound]] || Roadchef || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 || [[Lancaster|Lancaster northbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 48 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford southbound]] || Moto || 93 | |||
|- | |||
| 49 || [[Northampton|Northampton southbound]] || Roadchef || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 50 || [[Blackburn with Darwen]] || Extra || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 51 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor westbound]] || Welcome Break || 92 | |||
|- | |||
| 52 || [[Strensham|Strensham southbound]] || Roadchef || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 53 || [[Bridgwater]] || Moto || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 54 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 55 || [[Telford]] || Welcome Break || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 56 || [[Strensham|Strensham northbound]] || Roadchef || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 57 || [[Beaconsfield]] || Extra || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 58 || [[Chester]] || Roadchef || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 59 || [[Toddington|Toddington northbound]] || Moto || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 60 || [[Fleet|Fleet north-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | |||
|- | |||
| 61 || [[Woodall|Woodall southbound]] || Welcome Break || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 62 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park northbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 63 || [[Washington|Washington southbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 64 || [[Cobham]] || Extra || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 65 || [[Reading|Reading eastbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 66 || [[Winchester|Winchester southbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 67 || [[Leigh Delamere|Leigh Delamere westbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 68 || [[Lancaster|Lancaster southbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 69 || [[Frankley|Frankley northbound]] || Moto || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 70 || [[Sedgemoor (South)|Sedgemoor southbound]] || Roadchef || 90 | |||
|- | |||
| 71 || [[Toddington|Toddington southbound]] || Moto || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 72 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East southbound]] || Welcome Break || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 73 || [[Newport Pagnell|Newport Pagnell southbound]] || Welcome Break || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 74 || [[Tamworth]] || Moto || 89 | |||
|- | |||
| 75 || [[Ferrybridge]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 76 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge northbound]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 77 || [[Leigh Delamere|Leigh Delamere eastbound]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 78 || [[Birch|Birch westbound]] || Moto || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 79 || [[Newport Pagnell|Newport Pagnell northbound]] || Welcome Break || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 80 || [[Watford Gap|Watford Gap northbound]] || Roadchef || 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 81 || [[Rivington|Rivington southbound]] || Euro Garages || 87 | |||
|- | |||
| 82 || [[Keele|Keele southbound]] || Welcome Break || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 83 || [[Trowell|Trowell northbound]] || Moto || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 84 || [[Donington Park]] || Moto || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 85 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf southbound]] || Roadchef || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 86 || [[Washington|Washington northbound]] || Moto || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 87 || [[Medway|Medway westbound]] || Moto || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 88 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford northbound]] || Moto || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 89 || [[Gordano]] || Welcome Break || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 90 || [[Burton-in-Kendal]] || Moto || 86 | |||
|- | |||
| 91 || [[Woodall|Woodall northbound]] || Welcome Break || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 92 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East northbound]] || Welcome Break || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 93 || [[Clacket Lane|Clacket Lane eastbound]] || Roadchef || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 94 || [[Medway|Medway eastbound]] || Moto || 85 | |||
|- | |||
| 95 || [[Sedgemoor (North)|Sedgemoor northbound]] || Welcome Break || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 96 || [[Reading|Reading westbound]] || Moto || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 97 || [[Birch|Birch eastbound]] || Moto || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 98 || [[Southwaite|Southwaite southbound]] || Moto || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 99 || [[Watford Gap|Watford Gap southbound]] || Roadchef || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 100 || [[Rivington|Rivington northbound]] || Euro Garages || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 101 || [[Membury|Membury westbound]] || Welcome Break || 84 | |||
|- | |||
| 102 || [[Sandbach|Sandbach northbound]] || Roadchef || 83 | |||
|- | |||
| 103 || [[Southwaite|Southwaite northbound]] || Moto || 81 | |||
|- | |||
| 104 || [[Membury|Membury eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 81 | |||
|- | |||
| 105 || [[Blyth]] || Moto || 80 | |||
|- | |||
| 106 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard northbound]] || Welcome Break || 79 | |||
|- | |||
| 107 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard southbound]] || Welcome Break || 77 | |||
|- | |||
| 108 || [[Frankley|Frankley southbound]] || Moto || 75 | |||
|- | |||
| 109 || [[Cullompton]] || Extra || 74 | |||
|- | |||
| 110 || [[Burtonwood]] || Welcome Break || 73 | |||
|- | |||
| 111 || [[Severn View]] || Moto || 72 | |||
|} | |||
==2018 Survey== | ==2018 Survey== | ||
The second survey was conducted in Spring 2018. It worked much like the previous survey | The second survey was conducted in Spring 2018. It worked much like the previous survey, with modest improvements across the board. | ||
It also looked at brand identity, and found that [[Moto]], [[Euro Garages]], [[McDonald's]] and [[Costa]] were some of the most recognisable brand names. | It also looked at brand identity, and found that [[Moto]], [[Euro Garages]], [[McDonald's]] and [[Costa]] were some of the most recognisable brand names. | ||
Moto appeared to have a rough ride, with several poorly-performing sites and a poor total score. [[Westmorland]] and Euro Garages came joint top, with [[Roadchef]] responsible for the two top service stations. | Moto appeared to have a rough ride, with several poorly-performing sites and a poor total score. [[Westmorland]] and Euro Garages came joint top, with [[Roadchef]] responsible for the two top service stations. | ||
Line 22: | Line 902: | ||
| 4 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park southbound]] || Moto || 99 | | 4 || [[Hilton Park|Hilton Park southbound]] || Moto || 99 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 5 || [[Corley|Corley | | 5 || [[Corley|Corley south-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 99 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 6 || [[Frankley|Frankley northbound]] || Moto || 99 | | 6 || [[Frankley|Frankley northbound]] || Moto || 99 | ||
Line 38: | Line 918: | ||
| 12 || [[Blyth]] || Moto || 98 | | 12 || [[Blyth]] || Moto || 98 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 12 || [[Corley|Corley | | 12 || [[Corley|Corley north-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 98 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 12 || [[Fleet|Fleet | | 12 || [[Fleet|Fleet south-westbound (temporary)]] || Welcome Break || 98 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 12 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford southbound]] || Moto || 98 | | 12 || [[Knutsford|Knutsford southbound]] || Moto || 98 | ||
Line 76: | Line 956: | ||
| 29 || [[Doncaster (North)]] || Moto || 96 | | 29 || [[Doncaster (North)]] || Moto || 96 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 29 || [[Fleet|Fleet | | 29 || [[Fleet|Fleet north-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 96 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 29 || [[London Gateway]] || Welcome Break || 96 | | 29 || [[London Gateway]] || Welcome Break || 96 | ||
Line 182: | Line 1,062: | ||
| 81 || [[Washington|Washington southbound]] || Moto || 89 | | 81 || [[Washington|Washington southbound]] || Moto || 89 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 81 || [[Woolley Edge northbound]] || Moto || 89 | | 81 || [[Woolley Edge|Woolley Edge northbound]] || Moto || 89 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 86 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor westbound]] || Welcome Break || 88 | | 86 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor westbound]] || Welcome Break || 88 | ||
Line 237: | Line 1,117: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Separate to the main study, in 2018 Transport Focus also carried out a pilot study to gather feedback on the service areas on the [[A3]] and the [[A34]]. The study looked at the usual topics like the type of road user and the visitor satisfaction, as well as other comments such as users preferring a single amenity building, and not recognising the modern A-road service area signage. | |||
==2017 Survey== | ==2017 Survey== | ||
Line 245: | Line 1,127: | ||
Following the results, the Department for Transport pledged to investigate concerns with a shortage of HGV parking spaces. | Following the results, the Department for Transport pledged to investigate concerns with a shortage of HGV parking spaces. | ||
Perhaps surprisingly for what promised to be a rigorous review, the overall conclusion was that most services were already meeting customer's needs fine. Of the 112 services visited, only two scored less than 75%. Many received more than 90% satisfaction, and 97% of people polled said they would happily visit the same service station again. | Perhaps surprisingly for what promised to be a rigorous review, the overall conclusion was that most services were already meeting customer's needs fine. Of the 112 services visited, only two scored less than 75%. Many received more than 90% satisfaction, and 97% of people polled said they would happily visit the same service station again. | ||
Line 263: | Line 1,144: | ||
| 1 || [[Rivington|Rivington northbound]] || Euro Garages || 100 | | 1 || [[Rivington|Rivington northbound]] || Euro Garages || 100 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 3 || [[Corley|Corley | | 3 || [[Corley|Corley north-westbound]] || Welcome Break || 99 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 3 || [[Gloucester|Gloucester northbound]] || Westmorland || 99 | | 3 || [[Gloucester|Gloucester northbound]] || Westmorland || 99 | ||
Line 339: | Line 1,220: | ||
| 35 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf northbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | | 35 || [[Tibshelf|Tibshelf northbound]] || Roadchef || 94 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 41 || [[Corley|Corley | | 41 || [[Corley|Corley south-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 41 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East northbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | | 41 || [[Leicester Forest East|Leicester Forest East northbound]] || Welcome Break || 93 | ||
Line 369: | Line 1,250: | ||
| 54 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard northbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | | 54 || [[Charnock Richard|Charnock Richard northbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 54 || [[Fleet|Fleet | | 54 || [[Fleet|Fleet north-eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 54 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | | 54 || [[Hartshead Moor|Hartshead Moor eastbound]] || Welcome Break || 91 | ||
Line 383: | Line 1,264: | ||
| 62 || [[Ferrybridge]] || Moto || 90 | | 62 || [[Ferrybridge]] || Moto || 90 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 62 || [[Fleet|Fleet | | 62 || [[Fleet|Fleet south-westbound (temporary)]] || Welcome Break || 90 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 62 || [[Heston|Heston westbound]] || Moto || 90 | | 62 || [[Heston|Heston westbound]] || Moto || 90 |
Latest revision as of 19:09, 10 November 2024
Transport Focus (official website) is a 'watchdog' for transport users in the UK, sponsored by the Department for Transport. After England's major road network was taken out of direct government control, Transport Focus had their remit expanded in 2015 to represent the needs of users of those roads. In practice, their work involves conducting satisfaction surveys for the benefit of the industry and the media, which since 2017 has included a regular investigation into motorway service areas.
While their full study gives an interesting account of what customers look for in a service station, it is the so-called 'league table' that attracts press attention. The league table normally shows that the vast majority of service areas achieve virtually the same score, but by organising them into a scoreboard and ignoring the margin of error, it adds potential for some dramatic headlines that in turn generate publicity that is then used to justify the watchdog's expenditure.
Transport Focus's work remains much more thorough than many of the other 'surveys' that are published about service stations. However, while they sell their report as being for the benefit of consumers, their work is only really of immediate benefit of service station operators. For example, recent surveys have studied the use and satisfaction of different ordering systems, which no road user is going to factor into their journey, but the surveys have never studied the impact of service station location - which is extremely important to road users.
Their relentless positivity can be seen when comparing their satisfaction scores with those of consumer group Which? Magazine, which in a similar period produced much, much lower results. There is nothing inherently wrong with either study: they are both useful tools with a lot of data that has been packaged it up for very different audiences. In 2024, even Transport Focus felt fit to ask themselves why their results were seemingly out of step with public opinion, with their own foreword including the statement: "it is not clear exactly why there is such a large disparity between satisfaction at a particular site and provision as a whole".
As the UK's road authorities and the road network's facilities now have virtually no supervision, many people imagine Transport Focus will be that regulator, but their remit is merely to represent road users and their work on roads is more like a consultancy, where they provide helpful advice to the industry but never say anything that will cause any upset.
2023/2024 HGV Survey
Between September 2023 and February 2024, a new form of survey was conducted for the benefit of HGV drivers. This follows several years of criticism from HGV facilities that forced the Department for Transport to promise improvements. The results were published in November 2024, with follow-ups expected over the following years.
Surveys were conducted at roughly of a third of English HGV facilities, which included motorway service areas, some A-road service areas, signposted truckstops and most commercial truckstops that are positioned with 5km of an English trunk road; they reckon there are around 225 of these in total. Despite all the issues HGV drivers had reported, Transport Focus's work concluded that drivers were "highly satisfied" with the facilities they were using, despite the full report highlighting "significant" issues with a shortage of facilities, "major" complaints about there not being enough places to park, "increasing" concern that overnight parking is unsafe, "many" complaints about overnight parking being too noisy to sleep and "comparatively low" satisfaction with the food available. This discrepancy was highlighted by the report itself, but could not be explained.
The first two of those criticisms are largely out of the control of the facilities surveyed, so this survey ought to be treated more as an assessment of the scale of the problem, rather than a comparison of who's doing a good or a bad job, not that the media will view it that way. This is especially true seeing as only a representative sample have been studied, so the worst performers may not be the worst in the country.
The results shown below highlight the service areas and truckstops which are officially signed from the major road network only. In line with other pages on this website, facilities that aren't signposted are not included. The highest satisfaction score of 99% went to Formula Premier Truckstop in Ellesmere Port.
It is worth noting that the nearly-derelict Leeming Bar and the absolutely huge Beaconsfield both received the exact same score, suggesting that there is no link at all between size or scale and the result received.
2023 Survey
The 2023 survey took place during the spring and was published in October 2023, which began with a media event was held at Leeds Skelton Lake services and every participating operator sending a simultaneous tweet praising Transport Focus. This follows a summer where a large number of surveys from car hire companies have already been published and received a lot of media attention, despite those ones involving very little research.
Transport Focus's results are a little bit more considered, and were as follows:
EG Group, Westmorland and Stop 24 declined to be part of the survey, leaving just the major operators interested in the display.
The media were interested in Hartshead Moor coming last again, but Transport Focus were keen to point out that this may have been as refurbishment works were ongoing, following the previous year's results being published. The Transport Focus summary also pointed out that the Transport Focus survey results have improved since Transport Focus started doing surveys.
The results were published with the headline "satisfaction is high", despite starting from last year's high base. All four operators were praised, and while an example of a negative experience was given as staff being rude, it was immediately noted that this was rare and could have been because they were busy.
Roadchef and Moto did well in the top 10s, with Extra surprisingly lacking, and Moto and Welcome Break at the lower ends. What's more interesting is that newer buildings didn't seem to yield any better results. Another interesting detail is that Extra and Roadchef performed well for perceived value for money, whereas Moto and Welcome Break performed poorly on this metric. Killington Lake's toilets were fully recommended and Annandale Water was the most-recommended site.
HGV drivers remained the least satisfied road users, and prices remained the biggest complaint, although one interesting chart did suggest that this was only true for Welcome Break and Moto - the two operators we already knew were inflating prices - suggesting their policy was not unnoticed by the public.
2022 Survey
The delayed 2022 survey was published in October, where a media event was held at the winning Rugby services, which is also the UK's newest entry. The report announced that "MSAs are doing a great job" and that the results show that "service areas have once again performed well". Some issues were raised, like the high prices (as ever) and the poor HGV parking provision, but these were quickly glossed over and the government were thanked for improving HGV facilities.
This time the scope of the survey was expanded to include Wales and Scotland, but Moto did not enter sites outside England, and Westmorland opted not to enter any of their sites, which caused a lot of confusion in the media. Stop 24 did enter for the first time in a while.
Another change for 2022 was that customers surveyed would now be offered the opportunity to provide detailed feedback at a later date. This allowed people to respond in their own time, though it assumes their experience was in any way memorable.
What is interesting about the 2022 results is that the grade inflation is much more severe than it has been in previous years. The report itself asks that the figures do not be compared with previous years, because of the changed methodology and different time of year.
The 2022 survey received even more media coverage than usual, including a feature on Have I Got News For You, where one of the panellists called the league table "a waste of time".
Usual small print aside, the survey did show a large quantity of Moto service areas in the top 10, and of Welcome Breaks in the bottom 10. Euro Garages were technically the best operator, and Stop 24 technically the worst, but Extra were the best of the main operators and Welcome Break the worst of the main ones, where they scored particularly badly on toilets.
Extra service areas were said to be especially popular, with people seeking them out and an "exceptionally high" number of people recommending them. McDonald's and Costa were said to be the most popular brands.
2020 Survey
The 2020 survey methodology was cut short due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, Transport Focus wisely did not publish a complete list of all scores. Instead they published the average score for each operator, and allowed the media to heap praise on every service area run by that operator, including ones which aren't on motorways.
As always, the results for each operator were broadly proportionate to the number of sites they owned, with Moto getting 93% satisfaction and much-smaller Westmorland getting 97% satisfaction. Much was made of Euro Garages increasing their score from 86% to 96%, but as they only run one whole site, that figure is based on a much smaller sample and is prone to changing a lot.
2019 Survey
The 2019 survey was conducted in Spring 2019. In general most scores had fallen slightly, while the bottom few had all improved their act. The end result was that the rankings were shaken up a bit while remaining broadly the same.
In particular, Euro Garages had fallen from the best operator to the worst, leaving Westmorland back in front. It was another good year for Roadchef, and a disappointing one for Moto. It also found that professional drivers were the least satisfied, leisure the most, and prices remained the main bone of contention.
For the first time, the highly-publicised league table produced a ranking for every single entrant, breaking apart the sites which had the same score.
2018 Survey
The second survey was conducted in Spring 2018. It worked much like the previous survey, with modest improvements across the board.
It also looked at brand identity, and found that Moto, Euro Garages, McDonald's and Costa were some of the most recognisable brand names.
Moto appeared to have a rough ride, with several poorly-performing sites and a poor total score. Westmorland and Euro Garages came joint top, with Roadchef responsible for the two top service stations.
If you compare each individual site with 2017's score, you'll see a lot of wild fluctuations. This is the risk of using a small dataset, and asking a public who aren't that fussed. Even so, the general trends are still interesting.
Separate to the main study, in 2018 Transport Focus also carried out a pilot study to gather feedback on the service areas on the A3 and the A34. The study looked at the usual topics like the type of road user and the visitor satisfaction, as well as other comments such as users preferring a single amenity building, and not recognising the modern A-road service area signage.
2017 Survey
The first survey was conducted in Spring 2017, with the results presented at Beaconsfield in October 2017.
Although it analysed various aspects of how people use services, the main product was an individual customer satisfaction rating for every service station in England. The assessment covered road safety, pedestrian safety, wifi, and the quality of the exterior and interior.
Following the results, the Department for Transport pledged to investigate concerns with a shortage of HGV parking spaces.
Perhaps surprisingly for what promised to be a rigorous review, the overall conclusion was that most services were already meeting customer's needs fine. Of the 112 services visited, only two scored less than 75%. Many received more than 90% satisfaction, and 97% of people polled said they would happily visit the same service station again.
Heston received the lowest score, while Reading and Rivington both scored 100%.
Within the operators, Extra came top, while Westmorland came second. The big three were all very close together, but with Welcome Break third, Roadchef fourth and Moto fifth.
Value for money on parking, availability of parking and value for money on food were the three biggest concerns raised.
The full results are included below.